The short answer

An employer may be able to take disciplinary action over an employee’s social media activity, including activity outside working hours, where the facts give it a genuine connection to work. There is no automatic rule that an online post justifies dismissal. The employer should check the evidence, consider the employee’s explanation, apply its policies consistently and choose a proportionate outcome. If dismissal is being considered, the employer must assess the circumstances under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and follow a fair process. Privacy, discrimination and whistleblowing issues may also need careful attention.

When can a social media post become a workplace issue

A post, comment, image, video or message may raise a workplace concern if it appears to target colleagues, clients or the business; reveals confidential information; uses a company account inappropriately; or breaches a clear workplace policy. Posts in private groups or messages may also become relevant if they are shared with colleagues or relate to workplace conduct. A screenshot alone may not show the whole conversation or its context.

An employer should not assume that every personal post is a disciplinary matter. A relevant connection to work, the employee’s role, the audience and likely impact will matter. A post made outside work hours is not automatically beyond the employer’s concern, but an employer should be able to explain why it is addressing it and how its response is fair.

Can an employer dismiss someone for a post made outside work

Potentially, but not simply because the post is unpopular or embarrassing. Under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, conduct can be a potentially fair reason for dismissal. Whether a particular dismissal is fair depends on the reason and all the circumstances, including the employer’s investigation and decision-making. Eligibility to bring an unfair dismissal claim is a separate question. Check the statutory eligibility rules in force when advising on a particular dismissal.

Before taking action, consider the full circumstances. These may include what was said or shared, whether it was a personal or business account, the privacy settings and likely audience, any connection to the employer, whether the post was made during work, the employee’s role, the effect on colleagues or clients, and whether the employee had been given clear notice of the relevant standards. Also consider whether the post was edited, deleted or shared by someone else, and whether it was part of a longer exchange.

How should an employer investigate

A prompt response can be important, especially where there is a risk to staff, clients, confidential information or a company account. Acting quickly does not mean reaching a decision before the facts are checked. Preserve relevant material lawfully and record where it came from. Keep the full thread, dates, links and surrounding context where possible; do not rely on an isolated screenshot if more information may be available.

The Acas Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures says employers should carry out necessary investigations to establish the facts. In misconduct cases, where practicable, the person investigating should be different from the person conducting the disciplinary hearing. The employee should be told the allegations and given a reasonable opportunity to respond before a decision is made. If a formal disciplinary meeting could result in a warning or other disciplinary action, the statutory right to be accompanied may apply.

The employer should consider the employee’s explanation, relevant mitigation, consistency with similar cases and the range of reasonable outcomes. If action is taken, give the decision and reasons in writing and explain any right of appeal under the procedure. Dismissal for gross misconduct should be considered only where the conduct and circumstances justify it under the contract, policy and applicable law.

Privacy and monitoring matter too

Seeing a public post does not give an employer an unrestricted right to monitor an employee’s personal accounts. If the employer collects or uses personal information to investigate a concern, it should have a lawful and fair basis, be transparent where required, collect only what is necessary and restrict access to people who need it. The Information Commissioner’s Office says excessive monitoring can intrude into workers’ private lives and undermine their privacy.

Do not ask an employee to provide passwords or access to a private account as a routine step. If the employer is considering wider or ongoing monitoring, it should take data protection advice and check its privacy information, policies and any impact assessment requirements before proceeding.

Check for discrimination or whistleblowing concerns

A social media issue can involve more than misconduct. Posts may relate to harassment or discrimination at work, or an employee may say that their post raised concerns about wrongdoing. A public post is not automatically a protected disclosure, but an employer should not dismiss the possibility without checking the facts. Take advice before disciplining someone where the post may concern discrimination, health and safety, legal compliance or another protected issue.

Apply standards consistently and avoid treating employees differently because of a protected characteristic or because they have raised a protected concern. The same basic fact-finding process can help the employer understand both the post and any complaint about how it was handled.

What should a workplace social media policy cover

A clear policy can help employees understand the boundary between personal use and conduct that may affect work. It should fit alongside the disciplinary, equality, anti-harassment, confidentiality, IT and data protection policies. Employers should review it with managers and staff rather than relying on a policy that employees have never seen or understood.

  • Explain who may post on behalf of the organisation and who approves official content.
  • Set expectations for respectful conduct, confidentiality and use of company accounts or devices.
  • Give realistic examples of conduct that may lead to investigation, including relevant off-duty conduct, without claiming control over every personal post.
  • Explain how concerns can be raised and how the employer may investigate and preserve evidence.
  • Describe any monitoring clearly, including its purpose and scope, and reflect data protection requirements.
  • Provide training and apply the policy consistently, with periodic reviews as platforms and working practices change.

What should an employer do after seeing a concerning post

  • Assess any immediate risk to people, clients, confidential information or the organisation’s accounts.
  • Preserve relevant evidence with enough context to understand what happened.
  • Check the applicable policies and whether the employee was made aware of them.
  • Investigate impartially and give the employee a fair chance to respond.
  • Consider privacy, discrimination, whistleblowing and consistency issues before deciding what action, if any, is appropriate.
  • Record the reasons for the decision and explain any appeal route.

If an incident has become public, keep communications measured. Avoid repeating the post unnecessarily or sharing personal information more widely than needed.

Frequently asked questions

Can an employer discipline an employee for a private social media post

Possibly, if there is a sufficient connection to work and the response is lawful and fair. Privacy settings and the post’s audience are relevant, but do not answer the question by themselves. The employer should investigate the context and explain its reasons for taking action.

Can an employer dismiss someone for criticising the business online

Not automatically. The employer should consider what was said, its connection to work, any relevant policies, the employee’s explanation and the effect of the post. It should follow a fair disciplinary process and assess whether dismissal would be a reasonable outcome in the circumstances.

Can an employer monitor staff social media accounts

Monitoring must comply with data protection law and respect workers’ privacy. Employers should be clear about the purpose and scope of monitoring, ensure it is necessary and proportionate, and avoid collecting more personal information than they need.

Should an employer have a social media policy

A written policy is useful because it can explain expectations, how concerns will be handled and how company accounts may be used. It should be consistent with the employer’s other workplace policies and explained to staff.

Speak to The Legal Practice Solicitors

Our Employment Law team advises employers on workplace policies, contracts and employment-law compliance. We can help you review your current bereavement arrangements and prepare for the forthcoming statutory changes.

Telephone: 020 8903 7017

Email: employmentlaw@thelegalpractice.co.uk

Office: 122-126 Wembley Park Drive, Wembley Park, London HA9 8HP

Get advice on bereavement leave and employment policies.

 

Legal information

This article is for general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. The law may change and the outcome in any case depends on its facts. The Legal Practice Solicitors acts for employers and businesses in employment matters, not employees. Obtain advice on the specific circumstances before taking disciplinary action.

Anjalee Pandya

Angalee Pandya

Senior Consultant Employment Solicitor

Angalee Pandya is a Consultant Employment Law Solicitor at The Legal Practice Solicitors. She advises employers and employees on a wide range of employment law matters, including workplace disputes, discrimination claims, redundancy, settlement agreements, disciplinary and grievance procedures, workplace stress and Employment Tribunal proceedings. Anjalee provides practical, commercially focused advice tailored to the individual circumstances of her clients.

View Profile